The question is tricky, since it's really two different worlds and approaches. -
03-21-2010, 03:44 PM
Joomla has adopted a "one-click philosophy" which means you can install extensions easily, and themes too and there are a lot of both around. It makes building feature-rich websites a breeze, it's true but also makes it a real pain to customize. Another strong suit of Joomla is the polished "windows like" admin many come to like.
On the downside, though a lot of work has been done in that department, there are lots of hardcoded elements of presentation in the core code an extension's code.
It make the webdesigner's life a misery when it comes to fully customizing the look of a website using modern CSS approach (and, even if a lot of efforts have been made, validating your sites). Of course, you'll point me towards counter-examples, exquisite, customized and standard compliant Joomla websites, but how long did it takes to hack into those harcoded styles and html ? Seems like it's hard severing the ties to the Mambo past, despite great efforts to modernize the code.
Now MODx. When I discovered MODx I really felt like I had gotten a “Get out of jail” card : you are not bound by the system the way you are by most content management applications, the systems works for you, not the other way around and it feels good.
one that has impressed me most is clearly MODx, a lot of the stuff in MODx is pure genius and I wish I had thought of some of these things myself. During the past days I’ve setup a site in no time doing things with ease that would be awkard to do in for instance Joomla.